|
'Fool me once, shame on you', goes the hoary old folk wisdom, 'Fool me twice, shame on me'. UCLA has to be burning with shame this morning after fixing a problem by making it worse. In 1996, UCLA was sued by relatives of body donors who said that the university had disposed of bodies improperly. UCLA gets nearly two hundred cadavers willed to it each year. (Question: People who leave their bodies to science - are they not insane? Have they never watched 'Re-Animator'?) So in 1997 they hire this new guy, Henry Reid, embalmer by trade, and he heads up their 'Willed Body' program, and what does he decide to do? Start selling bodies. Sometimes the whole corpse, sometimes just individual parts. All the papers imply that he was selling to biotechnology firms, but so far, that appears to be just speculation. Reid has been arrested at his home near Disneyland. "We were very proud of the steps that Henry Reid convinced everyone he had taken, and we, frankly, are devastated," said UCLA lawyer, Louis Martin. I kind of have the same situation at work. I just tell everyone I'm doing a heck of a job, and they all leave me alone. "To tell you that this is one of the most disappointing moments in my 31-year legal career is an understatement," Marlin added. To which we can only say, "I guess so." I mean, wouldn't you like to hear what else ranks this low in terms of his jurisprudent oversight? The LA Times says that investigators are worried about dozens of cadavers having been sold by Reid, and they also mention those damn biomedical firms. Here's my take on that. Sure, your average biomedical firm likes corpses. They like 'em a lot. But buying a hot one is kind of like driving drunk in Syria - it just isn't worth the risk. You're going down. Come in here, Smithers. Officer Lewis says you've been corpsemongering. I'm thinking that it could be a lot worse than biomed labs. Remember during the Meiwes investigation when authorities said there were probably upwards of 800 potential cannibals in Germany? Don't tell me that LA can't match the Krauts sicko for sicko. Think I'm crazy? Alright. Lets take a walk over to the Scotsman, where they have the news on the arrest of a second perpetrator.
Yeah, right - hey buddy, my name is Joe and I have a research lab, ya mighta heard of it, 'Joe's Research Lab'. We got a slogan, 'Doin' a lotta good for a lotta people'. We're lookin for some fresh knees today, got any? Yeah, and a couple of torsos, we're researchin' pretty damn hard over there. The San Francisco Chronicle tells us that Nelson is outright surprised to be busted.
Time to call in the lawyer for an update. Looouuisss. Louis Marrr-lin.
Umm, thanks. |
| Corpsegate Widens As the lawsuits begin to arise from those who claim that UCLA administrators had knowledge of the ongoing sale of donated cadavers, it's time to take a look at our news sources.
The bad thing about the 'elite press', as Bill
O'Reilly calls any paper unwilling to regurgitate the party line, is not
their liberal leanings, but their position of not printing any of the
salacious details of the more grotesque or scandalous stories in the news.
The conservative press, on the other hand, will go for the scandal stories,
but only when they involve a prominent liberal, like, oh, the previous
president of the United States. In general, the European press likes
scandals by anyone, anywhere, anytime. Witness their extensive coverage of
Stephen Hawking, almost totally ignored stateside. So to begin with today's look at Corpsegate, let's check The New York Times for reaction at the university.
I can't say for sure, but from the fact that yesterdays news sited at least 100 firms making buys, I would guess that the fact some of them not be on the 'up-and-up' is a real possibility. Now we move down under to the Australian, which gives us the going rates for body parts.
The UCLA's Daily Bruin gives us the student doctor ("I think it's a real privilege to work with these cadavers. We're getting the gift of their life.") perspective.
|
©2004, Mark Hoback